Like cats and dogs

Lately I’ve been having too many ideas to sit down with any one of them and see it through. This includes blog posts, which I compose while trying to fall asleep at night or while pacing around my apartment, but not while actually at the computer. Today I decided that writing something short is better than nothing.

Reading about Reconcile, the doggie Prozac, reminded me of a sentence I recently came across on Borderline Personality Today’s page about BPD criteria:

Individuals with this disorder may feel more secure with transitional objects (i.e., a pet or inanimate possession) than in interpersonal relationships.

I thought it was a pretty poor choice of words. Yes, you don’t have the same sort of relationship with a pet that you do with another human being. I get what they’re trying to say here. But not being a person doesn’t make a pet an object. If a pet is an object, though, then it doesn’t matter to you if you use a quick fix for their behaviour that is convenient for you as opposed to seriously thinking about what solution is best for your pet. Note: I’m not talking here about people who have been diagnosed with BPD, even though this sentence happened to be on a site about BPD. I just mean that people who would refer to an animal as a “transitional object” seem to have the same mindset as people who would drug Muffy for piddling on the rug.

I’m not saying unequivocally that psych drugs for your pets are always 100% wrong, because I really don’t know enough about the subject. I know people who had their cat on kitty Prozac because of its OCD-like behaviour. It actually did physical harm to itself with excessive grooming and biting itself. They were worried about its physical health and obviously couldn’t be with the cat every second to keep it from hurting itself. Medication was not the first thing they tried, and their cat was only medicated on a short-term basis. The cat is now off SSRIs and is fine with only behavioural training. They also have another cat who has never had these problems.

What I am saying, though, is that the Reconcile site scares the crap out of me with paragraphs like this one:

Separation anxiety is a clinical condition in your dog’s brain. Your pet is not a bad dog. Your pet’s behavior is the result of separation anxiety.

Wow, “a clinical condition in your dog’s brain.” Isn’t that just the most specific thing you’ve ever read? What the hell does it even mean? It means “We want to convince you that your dog has a biologically-based medical condition but we don’t have evidence to support this, so we will be alarmingly vague. It is your duty to treat your dog’s clinical condition, damnit. You are a bad pet owner if you don’t get them the medicine they need.”

Does separation anxiety in dogs exist? Hell, yeah. And in cats, too — that’s what caused the excessive grooming and self-injurious behaviour of the cat I mentioned previously. But is separation anxiety “a clinical condition in your dog’s brain”? Umm…

My parents’ dog has very bad separation anxiety, but they’ve never considered drugging her because of it. They just use behavioural training, which works most of the time, and on the occasions when the dog pees on the rug or gets into the garbage anyway, well, then they just have to clean up after her.

I’m glad that Eli Lilly at least emphasizes the importance of behavioural modification in addition to drugs, but I’m sure that some pet owners will just ignore the entire training idea because medication is, you know, easier. For you, if not for your pet. Of course, just like meds in humans, the side effects of Reconcile are often the very things the drug is supposed to treat:

The most common adverse reactions recorded during clinical trials with Reconcileā„¢ were calm or lethargy, reduced appetite, vomiting, shaking, diarrhea, restlessness, excessive vocalization, aggression and, in infrequent cases, seizures.

If you look at the product label or this journal article, you’ll see that some of the side effects were quite common, especially calm/lethargy/depression. I guess if you’re not satisfied with doping up and numbing out your children, you might want to move on to your pets, too.

Well, this wound up being longer than I expected.

7 Responses to “Like cats and dogs”

  1. thememoryartist Says:

    They say:”The drug is proven safe for dogs and puppies 6 months or older.”

    Just watch. We’ll have a rash of agitated suicidal, homicidal puppies slitting their paws and going out on shooting sprees. Maybe they’ll have to develop a.o.t. and civil commitment laws to keep them in the dog pound if their owners won’t medicate their “brain disorder”. Is there a doggy DSM ?

  2. Philip Dawdy Says:

    thanks for the link as usual. great stuff. hope you are doing ok.

  3. Gianna Says:

    If you go to the product label link:

    http://www.reconcile.com/_layouts/downloads/reconcile-product-label.pdf

    And look under the heading “Animal Safety” you might get as pissed off as I did.

    I tried to copy and paste it, but it seems it doesn’t work with PDF files…is that right? Never noticed that before.

  4. Polly Says:

    I’m doing okay, except that Saturday I had a nightmare, and so last night I was too scared to try to get to sleep until 4 a.m. Oopsie.

    Gianna, do you mean about how they cavalierly mention the dogs that died during the laboratory study and don’t mention how/why they died? Did you notice that one of the dogs in a field study who started having seizures died, too?

  5. Mark(p.s.2) Says:

    Gianna Ok I will give some knowledge to you on PDF’s or anything else you see on your screen. You can not copy and paste with PDF’s. (did you ever download the zyprexia documents? someone converted the PDF to text-but-it-went-badly)

    So onto my main leason for today.
    1) Look at your keyboard. Look for the “print screen” button. On my keyboard (there are about 5 different standard layouts) it is to the right of my backspace button. Push it once.

    2)Then with the mouse click/go Start>All Programs>Accessories>Paint. The Paint program should open up/start running.

    3)In the program Paint, in the top header you should have “File” “Edit” “View ” etc. Click on “Edit” then “paste” in the dropdown menu. Then “paste” a second time.

    4)You should now see a snapshot displayed of whatever was just on your screen when you did step 1. NOW for some reason you now have to go “clear selection” in the “edit” dropdown to get everything right.

    5)Save and name the picture as a BMP or JPEG or whatever you like. BMP is the highest quality, but it uses alot of space. JPEG is smaller files size but you often lose significant detail in the picture.

    Once you have the screen capture saved you can now make a copy and mess with the copy.
    Why would I want to mess with it you ask? To make it SMALLER.and more IMPORTANTLY EDIT OUT YOUR PERSONAL DETAILS that may be in the capture picture. I mess with pictures using”flip/rotate” +”Rotate by angle 180″ and generally save as JPEG.

    http://psychsurvivor02.blogspot.com/2007/06/post-for-gianna.html

  6. Gianna Says:

    yes…Polly…that is what I was talking about…and Mark…you’re a doll! Too bad I’m a dunce! I’ll work on it.

  7. Polly Says:

    Yes, thank you, Mark. I’ve done that lots of times to take screenshots (although in Photoshop rather than Paint) but it never really occurred to me that it would be useful for PDFs. Silly me.

Leave a Reply